Eni — Cost Optimization
DELIVERED- Recognized by Eni's global headquarters
- Commended by regional GM of Technical Services
- Project proceeded on schedule and within budget
Backed by 13 years at Shell, $1.25B in capital delivered, and an Oil & Gas Journal publication. Purpose-built tools and hands-on completion expertise from the engineer who does the work.
With a degree in Computer Engineering and production deployments serving recent clients, I build custom software when the work demands it — equipment trackers, compliance workflows, operational dashboards.
THE PROBLEM
You need quick modeling answers for Frontend Engineering and Planning —
but service-company cycle times are holding you back, or software licenses are too costly.
THE SOLUTION
Lightweight tools sufficient for Concept Selection & General Validation.
THE DIFFERENCE
These tools are built by someone who has actually run completions,
not a developer translating requirements they don't fully understand.
Current modules include interactive well schematics, barrier-diagram compliance tooling, and calculation engines for directional and pressure analysis — plus end-to-end well models and operational reporting with Excel integration.
Advisory engagements are structured to fit within your existing program — working alongside the firms and partners already on it, not around them.
Offered as focused input inside existing engagements — not a standalone service.
Technically-accurate oil & gas animations and visuals — completion sequences, well schematics, subsea architecture — built and expert-validated by an engineer who has run the operations being depicted. This is a showcase of what can be built, not a standalone paid service.
Step-by-step animated walkthroughs of completion and intervention sequences for training or stakeholder review.
Depth-scaled well schematics and subsea system visuals built from real engineering data, not stock art.
Every visual is checked against actual operating experience — accuracy first, polish second.
Defined scope and deliverables with fixed timeline and clear success criteria.
Best for: design review, due diligence input, materials guidance
Ongoing availability for technical questions as they come up — sized to fit alongside your primary providers.
Best for: periodic technical review, second-opinion input
Quick-turnaround engagements for time-critical situations with focused expertise.
Best for: regulatory issues, emergency support, urgent challenges
Contact Corevigil to discuss your engineering challenge.